Enterprise Development Corporation
  • Home
  • The 504 Loan
    • Borrowers- 504 Standard
    • Lenders
    • Compare Conventional vs 504
  • 504 Refinance
    • Borrowers- Refinance
    • Lenders >
      • Public Policy Goals
  • Success Stories
  • Contact Us
  • About
    • FAQs
    • History
    • Contact
    • Useful Links
    • Board of Directors
  • Training Resources

Cost of Improvement

11/3/2014

0 Comments

 
It seems that what I talk about on this blog is often based on an idea I had while at a soccer tournament, watching TV with my son or drinking a beer.  However, believe it or not, everything I do is not based around soccer, lounging or alcohol.  I have a number of ideas and concepts that I talk about with my consulting clients and with Donna here at Enterprise.

I did a strategic planning session with a client two weeks ago, where we set goals and the tasks necessary to meet those goals for the coming year.  Many of the goals revolved around improving processes ( I always talk about ways to improve rather than ways to reduce…Improving sounds much more positive…I guess I am just a cockeyed optimist).  I am a big believer in constantly improving an organization and I think I provide the tools and facilitation skills to get it done.  However, I also always warn clients to be careful, because, just like in life, every improvement comes with a cost.  Some of these costs may be so small that they have no effect on the bottom line.  Others may be disastrous.  These costs may not all be immediately monetary.  In the beginning, they may manifest in new behaviors on the job or in morale changes.  Obviously, even these “psychological” changes have a cost.

I have clients that ask me about Six Sigma (six standard deviations from the process mean and the nearest tolerance point), which is a quality standard that seeks to obtain quality products or services that are 99.99966% (which is really 4.5 Sigma, nerd humor, ha ha) defect free.  It is an amazingly rigorous standard, and a noble and lofty goal for any organization.  However, reaching the standard has some serious costs.  An entire industry has developed for Six Sigma consultants and trainers.  Training is expensive and implementing the changes is very costly.  Even tracking the results is very expensive.  For a large organization, this “cost of quality” is probably totally worth it.  These standards, if rigidly enforced, may not be the best choice for a small organization.  They require too many resources to reach the standard.    

Here at Enterprise Development Corporation, we create goals and tasks for the coming year.  However, because of our relatively low loan volume, setting a 3.4 defects per million (which equates to Six Sigma standard) is unrealistic.  We set goals that try to improve our processes and work diligently to reach those goals.  We track our progress and celebrate when mission is accomplished and then continue working the next day to get a little better.   We write it down, measure it as best we can and keep moving forward.  Like any organization on a tight budget, the cost of quality has to be understood and considered before any major changes are undertaken.  I would encourage everyone start setting goals for the coming year.  Just make sure they are the right goals that deliver the results you are looking to achieve.

0 Comments

    Archives

    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    September 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    April 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

910 East Broadway, Suite 201 Columbia, MO 65201



573.875.8117
Proudly powered by Weebly